PLASTOCHRON
INDEX and LEAF PLASTOCHRON INDEX
I. Introduction
The plastochron index (plant age) and leaf plastochron (leaf age) index are ways of measuring the age of
plants and leaves on a morphological, rather than a temporal time scale. Why is this useful for botanical research?
Problems with a time-based scale
include: different germination times;
genetic variation in growth rate; exponential
(not linear) growth with respect to
time.
By “ageing” plants by their
morphology rather than chronological time,
P.I. eliminates the variation due to germination time and growth rate
and creates a linear scale to
measure development based on morphology. Also it is non-destructive.
Requirements for the plant
system:
1.
Plastochron (leaf production rate) must be constant
over study period.
2. Early leaf growth exponential up to initiation of next leaf.
3. Early growth
rate for leaves is the same (plots of log length vs. time creates a series
of parallel lines)
II. Formulas
P.I. = n +
log Ln - log l
---------------------- L.P.I. = P.I. - i
log Ln -
log Ln+1
l =
reference value leaf length
(e.g. 10 mm)
Ln = length of leaf n
n = the
number of the leaf equal to or just
longer than the
reference leaf
i =
number of the i th leaf
III. Figures (from Maksymowych 1973)
IV.
Examples
P.I. = n + log Ln -
log l
----------------------
log Ln - log Ln+1
Example 1: if L6 = 10 mm and L7
= 5 mm; then n = 6
P.I. = 6 +
log 10 - log 10
------------------------ =
6 + 0 = 6
log 10 -
log 5
Example 2: (the same plant
later) L6 = 12 mm and L7 = 7 mm;
then n = 6
P.I. = 6 + log
12 -
log 10
------------------------- = 6
+ .34 = 6.34
log 12
- log 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L.P.I. = P.I. - i
Example 1 Example
2
L.P.I.
for L7 = 6 - 7 = -1 L.P.I.
for L7 = 6.34 - 7 = - 0.66
L.P.I.
for L6 = 6 - 6 = 0 L.P.I.
for L6 = 6.34 - 6 = + 0.34
L.P.I.
for L5 = 6 - 5 = 1 L.P.I.
for L5 = 6.34 - 5 = + 1.34
V. Lab Excercise
Each
pair of students will work with one Xanthium (sunflower) plant.
Count
the number of leaves starting above the cotyledons (or scars) and continuing to
the smallest leaves that you will be able to measure. Identify the leaf just larger than the index length (20 mm).
Calculate
the P.I. for the plant and the L.P.I. for each leaf on the plant.
Is
there a consistent mathematical relationship (difference) between the calculated
values for P.I. and L.P.I and the L.P.I. values of the successive leaves?
Which
leaves have a negative L.P.I.?
If
you have time you can measure a second plant and make the calculations.
VI. Literature
Dickson, R.E. and P.R. Larson. 1981. C14 Fixation, metabolic labelling patterns and translocation profiles during
leaf development in Populus deltoides
Planta 152: 461-470.
Erickson, R.O. and F.J. Michelini. 1957. The plastochron index. Amer. J. Bot. 44: 297-304.
Larson,
P.R. and J.G. Isebrands. 1971.
The plastochron index as applied to developmental studies of
cottonwood. Can. J. Forest Res. 1:
1-11.
Maksymowych, R. and R.O. Erickson. 1960.
Development of the lamina in Xanthium italicum represented by the
plastochron index. Amer. J. Bot. 47: 451-459.
Maksymowych, R. 1973. Analysis of Leaf Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.